Washington Post: The first person I spoke to was clueless, but h...
GetHuman用户~criggs来自November 24th, 2017的Washington Post条客户评论
~criggs案的背景
GetHuman：~criggs-您能告诉我们其他Washington Post个客户何时提起诉讼吗？
~criggs：Yes I can。在November 21st上是afternoon。
GetHuman：您是否接触到Washington Post，如果可以，怎么做？
GetHuman：这些常见的Washington Post客户问题中，哪一个最能说明您想与他们交谈的原因？
（显示 ~criggs 常见 Washington Post 问题的列表）
~criggs：“ Refund”是我尝试使用to call的原因。
~criggs对Washington Post客户服务的评价
GetHuman：那么，您如何总结GetHuman的Washington Post客户社区的经验呢？对于使用此资源的数百万其他客户，我们将审查此处的任何ID，数字或代码以及任何不适当的词语。
~criggs：The first person I spoke to was clueless, but had no difficulty quickly figuring out to whom I needed to be transferred. They transferred me to technical support, and also supplied me with a direct number to that department, **********. Once transferred, that department quickly understood the issue, and proceeded to follow up on it. Positive communication experience, even if the issues is not yet fixed* but I was left reasonably confident that the issue would be addressed.*The alternate *** number which you list for the Washington Post, on the other hand, I found quite useless. It connects to some clueless phone jockeys who don't know their backside from a hole in the ground and simply pass along messages that they really don't understand* waste of time.
GetHuman：让我们量化一下您与Washington Post联系的经验。在1到5的范围内，如何轻松解决Washington Post问题？
~criggs：为了给您找到帮助的方便，我会给他们五分之三的four。
GetHuman：沟通质量如何？您如何以1到5的等级对其评分？
~criggs：在沟通方面，我会给他们五分之三的one。
GetHuman：Washington Post快速有效地解决问题的能力又如何呢？
~criggs：为此，我要说出五分之二的five。
GetHuman：最后-对其他Washington Post客户有何建议？
~criggs：在一天中的早些时候或深夜给他们打电话。不要忘记Washington Post可能需要的任何个人或帐户信息，以了解您的身份。
GetHuman：好吧，你有它。 ~criggs在November 21st, 2017发生的Washington Post客户服务问题中得到了一些有用的反馈和措辞。